Thoughts Across The Bow

The Hypostatic Union: The Divinity of Christ Jesus is commonly referred to as the God-man due to the fact that He is fully God and fully man in one person.   Origen (AD 184-253) of Alexandria was the first one to coin the term “God-man” to describe this hypostatic union of Jesus’s two natures. [1]   Jesus being divine and human is a first-order theological issue that is interrelated with other crucial biblical assertions (atonement, worship, Trinity, etc.). The aim of this post is to provide biblical evidence that Jesus was fully God and argue the necessity of His divinity. This conversation will raise other important questions regarding Christology, but are beyond the scope of this post. Jesus’s deity and His actions (statements, miracles, etc.) are intrinsically intertwined. Jesus made many claims concerning His deity without overtly claiming, “I am God.” [2]   If one follows these assertions made by Jesus concerning His identity, then the logical out...

The Hypostatic Union: The Humanity of Christ Jesus is unique in that He is one person with two natures, one nature being divine, and the other nature being human.   This description of Jesus’s two natures is referred to as the hypostatic union.   This description of Jesus is firmly rooted in Scripture and was defended throughout church history.   Denial of either Jesus’s divinity or humanity causes errors in theology and diminishes interrelated doctrines concerning Christ’s work.   The goal of this post is to provide biblical evidence that Jesus was fully human and argue the necessity of Jesus’s humanity.   There are more in-depth questions relevant to the discussion regarding Christology, but they are beyond the scope of this post.   One must also humbly admit that there is some divine mystery present in this doctrine.           Jesus’s humanity or the fact that He was a man should not be dismissed as common...

Can God Make a Rock so Big…? I remember when I first had this question brought to my attention.   I was sitting in a coffee shop a block from my college campus.   I had just talked with my roommate who had just wrecked on his bicycle going to meet a girl and his face looked like he had just lost a fight with a bear (apparently his face absorbed most of the impact generated by his flailing body).   My friend Sean put the question out there, “Can God make a rock so big that he cannot lift it?”   I felt a lot like my friend’s face looked, the mass and gravity of the question registered with me.   I had just finished my first philosophy class and all I could muster at the time was, “Can a car be too fast, can you have too much fun, or can a girl be too pretty?”   My distraction highlighted the contradiction apparent in the question, but this was not a satisfactory answer in my mind.   I logged the question for another day. Philosophers an...

The Mandalorian, a Compelling Pro-life Argument: While I am far from a Star Wars aficionado, the TV show “The Mandalorian” caught my attention.  For some context, the TV show centers around a professional bounty hunter who ends up saving a child (baby Yoda), protecting this child, and the mantra “this is the way” becomes a powerful moral theme throughout the show. Recently at the pro-life march in Washington, the March for Life, several people were holding signs that utilized this bit of pop-culture.  The signs capitalized on the popularity of this television show and its captivating plot.  The signs depicted the Mandalorian (a bounty hunter) holding baby Yoda and displayed the caption, “Protect the child, this is the way.”  The signs themselves represent a compelling argument that questions the internal consistency of naturalism and the pro-choice position. While the philosophy of naturalism has wide ranging associations, the main tenant is the philos...

Theology: Inerrancy of Scripture Inerrancy is the doctrine that the Bible is fully truthful in all of its teachings. [1]   The word inerrancy is not found or defined in the Bible.  However, the writers of Scripture imply the full truthfulness of the Bible.  The doctrine of inerrancy has many far reaching implications connected to the Christian faith.  For if the Bible is not trustworthy, then our knowledge of God could be called into question and our knowledge of God could be unreliable.  The direct implication being that the very truth or hope of the Gospel could be called into question.  Inerrancy is also linked to the Bible being the authority in our lives.  The goal of this post is to simply explain the biblical foundation for inerrancy of scripture. Divine inspiration is directly tied to inerrancy, so it is wise for one to begin at inspiration.   The Bible in its original manuscripts was written by men divinely inspired by the...

Theology: Inspiration of Scripture Definition of Inspiration: The inspiration of Scripture can be defined as the supernatural influence the Holy Spirit had on the writers of Scripture that made their writings accurate, and resulted in what they wrote being the Word of God. [1]             Through reading of the Bible, one is faced with the claim and assumption that Scripture is the Word of God.   The goal of this post is to provide evidence that the Bible is the inspired Word of God and provide readers with biblical references supporting this claim.   For simplicity, this post will specifically use several portions of 2 nd Peter as a vehicle to support this claim (although there are other methods of arguing for inspiration).       Peter provides evidence that New Testament authors believed that the Old Testament was inspired by God.   Peter states, “Knowing this first of all that no prophecy...

Paul: Making Tents and Decisions for the Gospel While reading through Acts and Paul’s epistles, the reader can trace how Paul made decisions with the mindset of furthering the Gospel and building up the church.  The last post examined how Paul’s decision-making was influenced by the Gospel in regards to circumcision with Timothy and Titus.  Paul holds up his decision-making and examines his options in light of the Gospel.  This post will continue to analyze this theme of Gospel centrality in Paul’s decision-making in regards to Paul self-funding his ministry efforts.  Luke in his historical account of the Apostles, records that Paul was a tent-maker by trade (Acts 18:3).  Luke recorded Paul telling the elders of the church in Ephesus that he coveted no one’s money and worked hard to support his ministry (Acts 20:33-35).  At the end of Acts, Paul is under house arrest in Rome (Acts 28:16) and evangelizes at his own expense for two years (Acts ...